Ohio’s Energy Scandal: Why Competition Is Essential

The reality of opening your electric bill is that you can discover, on top of what you already owe, there are hidden charges quietly supporting outdated, costly power plants. If you live or work in Ohio, that scenario became real, caught up in a whirlwind of corruption and backdoor dealings.

Here at the Alliance for Competitive Power (ACP), we've seen firsthand what can happen when competition in electricity markets is cast aside. As we navigate through January 2026, the Ohio energy landscape is finally reaching a "day of reckoning" for the companies and individuals involved.

Ohio’s Utility Scandal: A Timeline of Accountability

House Bill 6 (HB 6), a name now etched into the memories of Ohioans as a symbol of what can go wrong. This bill originally set aside a jaw-dropping $1.3 billion to bail out aging nuclear and coal plants. Behind closed doors, it was fueled by a $60 million bribery scheme.

In January 2026, we are seeing major milestones in restoring justice:

  • The Massive Settlement: On January 7, 2026, the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) approved a landmark $275 million settlement for FirstEnergy customers. If you are an Ohio Edison, Toledo Edison, or Illuminating Company customer, you can expect significant bill credits roughly $65.61 for the average user, over the next three months.

  • The End of Coal Subsidies: After years of advocacy, the corrupt subsidies for the OVEC coal plants finally expired in August 2025. From 2020 to 2025, Ohio utility customers propped up these failed plants to the tune of over $445,000 per day, totaling more than $500 million.

  • Criminal Trials Resume: While Larry Householder is currently serving a 20-year sentence, former FirstEnergy executives Chuck Jones and Michael Dowling are scheduled for trial starting January 26, 2026, in Summit County. High-profile state leaders have been named as potential witnesses.

Paying Twice: The Real Price for You

This scandal wasn’t just about corruption behind a fancy desk. It reached into your home, your business, and your wallet. As reported by the Electric Power Supply Association, everyday Ohioans were footing the bill twice: once for the electricity they used, and a second time for forced subsidies propping up uncompetitive plants.

According to the Brookings Institution, this "silent tax" slowed down Ohio's energy transition. Instead of benefiting from an open market, with its affordable electricity and greener innovations, Ohioans were forced to underwrite the past.

Corruption’s Ripples: Spreading Beyond State Lines

Ohio’s saga didn’t just stop at its borders. Utilities have fought hard to hold on to profit-boosting charges, even as investigators uncovered more layers of the scheme. According to the Energy and Policy Institute, this mess revealed how utility corruption can bend energy policies in unhealthy directions, sometimes even reaching influential circles in Washington.

The consequences are real, but as the Ohio Capital Journal points out, even with the recent $275 million settlement, the total damage to consumer trust remains immense.

Competition: The Foundation of Real Progress

When utilities can dodge competition through political games, it’s regular folks who lose out. According to Energy Changemakers, bailouts smother the spark of innovation and block cleaner, cheaper alternatives.

Our own independent research with FTI Consulting points to something crystal clear: states that stick to competitive power markets generally see slower rate increases and a quicker shift to clean energy than those ruled by monopolies. You’ll find even more comparisons by browsing our ACP homepage.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What’s the main takeaway from Ohio’s energy scandal? This case shows how unchecked utility power can crush competition and drive up bills.

  • Are Ohio customers still bearing the costs from HB 6? Most subsidies for coal and nuclear have now been repealed or expired as of late 2025.

  • How much is the FirstEnergy refund? The average residential customer using 1,000 kWh per month is expected to receive approximately $65.61 in total bill credits over three months in early 2026.

  • Where can I learn the basics about how electricity rates are set? Head on over to our blog post, How Are Electricity Rates Set?, for a plain-English guide.

Conclusion: Ohio’s energy scandal is a wake-up call. Here at ACP, we believe your voice should carry weight in the policies that drive our electric future. Visit our News page for regular updates, or reach out to us directly to join the movement.

Alliance for Competitive Power

The Alliance for Competitive Power believes we must keep energy markets open and competitive and not allow electricity monopolies to dictate prices and limit your choices. By protecting and encouraging competition in electricity generation markets, we can drive down costs while working to make sure power generation doesn’t fall back into the hands of an elite few.

https://www.allianceforcompetitivepower.org/
Previous
Previous

Illinois Utility Bailouts: Why Consumers Bear the Cost

Next
Next

Pennsylvania at a Crossroads: Competition or Monopolies?